"Girls arrested for a post on FB opposing something, something"
"Techie arrested for a tweet opposing someone"
"Some leader denounced and came under fire for saying someone's IQ level equals some one else's"
"Some leader denounced for saying he admires Hilter"
"Some cine-star made to apologise because she supports abortion"
'Someone's novel banned in India because he opposed something/glorified something"
"Some painter was banished from India because he portrayed Indian goddesses in his own way"
Maybe each of the above headlines are of a different nature and have different connotations - but to me they all have an underlying theme - You are free to speak, but not something that I don't agree with. And if you do, you hurt my sentiments and my pride.
This is very disturbing because, depending on who I am and what I can do, I could choose to react to your right to opinion in various ways. So if I am just an ordinary citizen, the 'aam aadmi' - I can curse you, give you gaalis on any social platform or make you the butt of my jokes near the office water cooler, or if I am really someone with power - muscle, money, political or underworld, I can put you behind bars, snatch away the dignity your work deserves, disfigure your face, break your bones or even have you killed. In short, the 'the right to be provoked' seems more fundamental than the 'right to speak'.
To me, it just seems unfair that people and media hype and react to the instance when someone was sent to jail for 'expressing her sentiments' and just ignore the other instances when a lesser fate was meted out for the same "crime"...Each instance was a violation to someone else's freedom of expression. To me, the unconscientious trend of intolerance to another's opinion is dangerous enough, how someone opposes it is just an aftermath. As a country, as a class, if tolerance to another's opinion, no matter how irrational, insensitive and stupid, cannot be practiced, we are setting very bad precedents and transitioning a very explosive nation to the next generation. The tendency to be easily provoked, to be easily hurt and to be easily 'stupid and vulnerable' can cloud our rationale, our judgment and eventually our decisions and actions.
If you have seen or read or heard about mob culture, you will realize that people in a mob are generally good, decent people - often loving spouses and fathers - they just acted the way they did, because " their sentiments were hurt, they were provoked". People in a mob do not think, certainly do not understand, but almost always react. And my fear is, if we don't practise tolerance and restraint, we can end up doing more harm to our people and to our society, when 'provoked', if 'hurt'...the kind of harm we read in newspapers, watch in television everyday.
Sometimes, I think, freedom itself is a precious power that few people understand and fewer can handle - a power which needs to be handled responsibly and with incredible maturity. We are seeing everyday how the press misuses this freedom. A free society is one where you are as free to speak as I am and I have the duty to listen or tolerate as much as you do. A free society is one which is vociferous and intolerant when it comes to degenerative practices, actions and mindset, but upholds to the very end, the right of its citizens to speak and speak as freely as possible.
Sounds impractical? See, I don't understand how someone could admire Hitler the same way as how someone could blame women for rapes, but I think blowing something out of proportion, making it a national debate or giving such things more attention than necessary, is not what a true democracy should practise. Instead of focusing on what someone said regarding rape of women and children, let's focus on bringing about laws and empowerment which ensures culprits do not get away with any 'gift of the gab'...
For better and rational laws and to bring about changes to the society, we need free, independent, fearless speakers and sometimes we need to tolerate stupidity once in a while to be able to achieve that. This is the society that condemned Galileo because he claimed that the earth moves and is not stationary. We need to go beyond just opinions and views to judge a person and today we are a country that doesn't take kindly to frank (ok, maybe sometimes stupid) opinions nor does tolerate its head of state being mum on critical issues. By now, we have all come to realize that it is better to have an opinion and take a stand rather than being 'mum' and 'aloof'.
So unless we have the power of reasoning and restraint, we will continued getting 'provoked' and 'hurt', no matter how harmless the opinion or the comment. And let's always remember - "Everyone is free to speak, no ifs and no buts!
"Techie arrested for a tweet opposing someone"
"Some leader denounced and came under fire for saying someone's IQ level equals some one else's"
"Some leader denounced for saying he admires Hilter"
"Some cine-star made to apologise because she supports abortion"
'Someone's novel banned in India because he opposed something/glorified something"
"Some painter was banished from India because he portrayed Indian goddesses in his own way"
Maybe each of the above headlines are of a different nature and have different connotations - but to me they all have an underlying theme - You are free to speak, but not something that I don't agree with. And if you do, you hurt my sentiments and my pride.
 |
| Image from www.luckybogey.wordpress.com |
This is very disturbing because, depending on who I am and what I can do, I could choose to react to your right to opinion in various ways. So if I am just an ordinary citizen, the 'aam aadmi' - I can curse you, give you gaalis on any social platform or make you the butt of my jokes near the office water cooler, or if I am really someone with power - muscle, money, political or underworld, I can put you behind bars, snatch away the dignity your work deserves, disfigure your face, break your bones or even have you killed. In short, the 'the right to be provoked' seems more fundamental than the 'right to speak'.
To me, it just seems unfair that people and media hype and react to the instance when someone was sent to jail for 'expressing her sentiments' and just ignore the other instances when a lesser fate was meted out for the same "crime"...Each instance was a violation to someone else's freedom of expression. To me, the unconscientious trend of intolerance to another's opinion is dangerous enough, how someone opposes it is just an aftermath. As a country, as a class, if tolerance to another's opinion, no matter how irrational, insensitive and stupid, cannot be practiced, we are setting very bad precedents and transitioning a very explosive nation to the next generation. The tendency to be easily provoked, to be easily hurt and to be easily 'stupid and vulnerable' can cloud our rationale, our judgment and eventually our decisions and actions.
If you have seen or read or heard about mob culture, you will realize that people in a mob are generally good, decent people - often loving spouses and fathers - they just acted the way they did, because " their sentiments were hurt, they were provoked". People in a mob do not think, certainly do not understand, but almost always react. And my fear is, if we don't practise tolerance and restraint, we can end up doing more harm to our people and to our society, when 'provoked', if 'hurt'...the kind of harm we read in newspapers, watch in television everyday.
Sometimes, I think, freedom itself is a precious power that few people understand and fewer can handle - a power which needs to be handled responsibly and with incredible maturity. We are seeing everyday how the press misuses this freedom. A free society is one where you are as free to speak as I am and I have the duty to listen or tolerate as much as you do. A free society is one which is vociferous and intolerant when it comes to degenerative practices, actions and mindset, but upholds to the very end, the right of its citizens to speak and speak as freely as possible.
Sounds impractical? See, I don't understand how someone could admire Hitler the same way as how someone could blame women for rapes, but I think blowing something out of proportion, making it a national debate or giving such things more attention than necessary, is not what a true democracy should practise. Instead of focusing on what someone said regarding rape of women and children, let's focus on bringing about laws and empowerment which ensures culprits do not get away with any 'gift of the gab'...
For better and rational laws and to bring about changes to the society, we need free, independent, fearless speakers and sometimes we need to tolerate stupidity once in a while to be able to achieve that. This is the society that condemned Galileo because he claimed that the earth moves and is not stationary. We need to go beyond just opinions and views to judge a person and today we are a country that doesn't take kindly to frank (ok, maybe sometimes stupid) opinions nor does tolerate its head of state being mum on critical issues. By now, we have all come to realize that it is better to have an opinion and take a stand rather than being 'mum' and 'aloof'.
So unless we have the power of reasoning and restraint, we will continued getting 'provoked' and 'hurt', no matter how harmless the opinion or the comment. And let's always remember - "Everyone is free to speak, no ifs and no buts!
1 comment:
And the irony in all of this...he definition of democracy id a question mark here and we are supposed to be the "largest democracy" in the world!
Post a Comment